Citation:
David Keith and Andy Parker. 2013. “The fate of an engineered planet.” Scientific American, 308, Pp. 34-36. Publisher's Version
Filter
People
- David Keith (191)Apply David Keith filter
- Joshua Horton (20)Apply Joshua Horton filter
- Gernot Wagner (16)Apply Gernot Wagner filter
- Pete Irvine (15)Apply Pete Irvine filter
- Debra Weisenstein (10)Apply Debra Weisenstein filter
- John Dykema (8)Apply John Dykema filter
- Lee Miller (7)Apply Lee Miller filter
- Lizzie Burns (3)Apply Lizzie Burns filter
- Sebastian Eastham (3)Apply Sebastian Eastham filter
- Zhen Dai (3)Apply Zhen Dai filter
- Colleen Golja (2)Apply Colleen Golja filter
- Hongwei Sun (1)Apply Hongwei Sun filter
- Jake Seeley (1)Apply Jake Seeley filter
- Mariia Belaia (1)Apply Mariia Belaia filter
- Tony Harding (1)Apply Tony Harding filter
Research Areas
- Solar Geoengineering (89)Apply Solar Geoengineering filter
- Energy (73)Apply Energy filter
- Public Policy (51)Apply Public Policy filter
- Climate Science (30)Apply Climate Science filter
- General Interest (30)Apply General Interest filter
- Carbon Capture and Storage (19)Apply Carbon Capture and Storage filter
- Physics (10)Apply Physics filter
- Direct Air Capture (9)Apply Direct Air Capture filter
Filter Instructions
Filter publications by selecting an author and/or topic of interest. Note that you can customize your search by (1) selecting one or multiple author(s), (2) selecting one or multiple topic(s), or (3) selecting both author(s) and topic(s). De-select authors and topics to re-start your search.
Recent Publications
- The Value of Information About Geoengineering and the Two-Sided Cost of Bias
- An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols
- Developing a Plume-in-Grid Model for Plume Evolution in the Stratosphere
- Heat has larger impacts on labor in poorer areas
- Social science research to inform solar geoengineering: What are the benefits and drawbacks, and for whom?
- Optimal climate policy in 3D: mitigation, carbon removal, and solar geoengineering
Op-Eds
- The Value of Information About Geoengineering and the Two-Sided Cost of Bias
- An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols
- Developing a Plume-in-Grid Model for Plume Evolution in the Stratosphere
- Heat has larger impacts on labor in poorer areas
- Elicitation of US and Chinese expert judgments show consistent views on solar geoengineering
- Solar geoengineering research on the U.S. policy agenda: when might its time come?
- Solar geoengineering can alleviate climate change pressures on crop yields
- The U.S. Can't Go It Alone on Solar Geoengineering
- Expert judgments on solar geoengineering research priorities and challenges
- Improving Models for Solar Climate Intervention Research
- Aerosol Dynamics in the Near Field of the SCoPEx Stratospheric Balloon Experiment
- Climate Policy Enters Four Dimensions
- Experimental reaction rates constrain estimates of ozone response to calcium carbonate geoengineering
- Designing a radiative antidote to CO2
- An earth system governance perspective on solar geoengineering
- Parametric Insurance for Solar Geoengineering: Insights from the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative
- Steering and Influence in Transnational Climate Governance: Nonstate Engagement in Solar Geoengineering Research
- Can Industrial-Scale Solar Hydrogen Supplied from Commodity Technologies Be Cost Competitive by 2030?
- Halving warming with stratospheric aerosol geoengineering moderates policy-relevant climate hazards
- Estimating Impacts and Trade‐offs in Solar Geoengineering Scenarios With a Moist Energy Balance Model
- Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance
- Multilateral parametric climate risk insurance: a tool to facilitate agreement about deployment of solar geoengineering?
- Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model
- Strategic implications of counter-geoengineering: Clash or cooperation?
- The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice
- Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards
- Parametric Insurance as an Alternative to Liability for Compensating Climate Harms
- Observation-based solar and wind power capacity factors and powerdensities
- Climatic Impacts of Wind Power
- Stopping Solar Geoengineering Through Technical Means: A Preliminary Assessment of Counter-Geoengineering
Copyright © 2024 The President and Fellows of Harvard College | Accessibility | Digital Accessibility | Report Copyright Infringement