Proposed large-scale intentional interventions in natural systems in order to counter climate change, typically called “climate engineering” or “geoengineering,” stand to dramatically alter the international politics of climate change and potentially much more. There is currently a significant and growing literature on the international politics of climate engineering. However, it has been produced primarily by scholars from outside the discipline of International Relations (IR). We are concerned that IR scholars are missing a critical opportunity to offer insights into, and perhaps help shape, the emerging international politics of climate engineering. To that end, the primary goal of this paper is to call the attention of the IR community to these developments. Thus, we offer here an overview of the existing literature on the international politics of climate engineering and a preliminary assessment of its strengths and lacunae. We trace several key themes in this corpus, including problem structure, the concern that climate engineering could undermine emissions cuts, the potentially “slippery slope” of research and development, unilateral implementation, interstate conflict, militarization, rising tensions between industrialized and developing countries, and governance challenges and opportunities. The international politics of climate engineering is then considered through the lenses of the leading IR theories (Realism, Institutionalism, Liberalism, and Constructivism), exploring both what they have contributed and possible lines of future inquiry. Disciplinary IR scholars should have much to say on a number of topics related to climate engineering, including its power and transformational potentials, the possibility of counter-climate engineering, issues of institutional design, international law, and emergent practices. We believe that it is incumbent on the IR community, whose defining focus is international relations, to turn its attention to these unprecedented technologies and to the full scope of possible ramifications they might have for the international system.
Solar Geoengineering
Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, Pp. 11835-11859. Publisher's Version
. 2015. “
The Emergency Framing of Solar Geoengineering: Time for a Different Approach.” The Anthropocene Review. Publisher's Version
. 2015. “
Climate Emergencies Do Not Justify Engineering the Climate.” Nature Climate Change. Publisher's Version
. 2015. “
Liability for Solar Geoengineering: Historical Precedents, Contemporary Innovations, and Governance Possibilities.” NYU Environmental Law Journal, 22, Pp. 225-273. Publisher's Version
. 2015. “
A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering.” Nature Climate Change, 5. Publisher's Version
. 2015. “
Will solar geoengineering help us manage the risks of climate change?” Our world and us: How our environment and our societies will change, Pp. 76-92. Publisher's Version
. 2015. “
Solar geoengineering to limit rate of temperature change.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372. Publisher's Version
. 2014. “
Field experiments on solar geoengineering: report of a workshop exploring a representative research portfolio.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372. Publisher's Version
. 2014. “
Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment (SCoPEx): a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372. Publisher's Version
. 2014. “
Solar Geoengineering: Reassessing Benefits, Costs, and Compensation.” Ethics, Policy & Environment. Publisher's Version
. 2014. “
A multi-model assessment of regional climate disparities caused by solar geoengineering.” Environmental Research Letters, 9. Publisher's Version
. 2014. “
Geoengineering: the world’s largest control problem.” American Control Conference, Pp. 2401-2406. Publisher's Version
. 2014. “
Solar Geoengineering and the Problem of Liability.” Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series. Publisher's Version
. 2013. “
Dynamics of the coupled human-climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering.” Climate Dynamics, 43, Pp. 243-258. Publisher's Version
. 2013. “