Debra Weisenstein
Experimental reaction rates constrain estimates of ozone response to calcium carbonate geoengineering.” Communications Earth & Environment, 1, 63. Publisher's VersionAbstract
. 12/2020. “
Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19. Publisher's Version
. 4/11/2019. “
Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering.” Geophysical Research Letters, 45. Publisher's VersionAbstract
. 1/2018. “Mitigating the Risk of Geoengineering
Stratospheric Solar Geoengineering without Ozone Loss.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Publisher's VersionAbstract
. 12/12/2016. “
Development and evaluation of the unified tropospheric–stratospheric chemistry extension (UCX) for the global chemistry-transport model GEOS-Chem.” Atmospheric Environment, 89, Pp. 52-63. Publisher's VersionAbstract
. 2014. “
Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, Pp. 11835-11859. Publisher's Version
. 2015. “
Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment (SCoPEx): a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372. Publisher's Version
. 2014. “
Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft.” Geophysical Research Letters, 37. Publisher's Version
. 2010. “